For years we have been told that salt is bad. It has been stripped from increasing numbers of frozen foods, prepared foods, packaged foods, and – of course – nearly every fast food restaurant that government bureaucrats can get their hands on.
The problem, of course, is that they are politicians and rarely know what they’re talking about when it comes to the nuances of the health and well-being of the human body.
The science of salt is infamously fickle. There are research saying an excessive amount of sodium will increase the danger of coronary heart illness, different research saying too little can hurt the guts, and nonetheless others saying there isn’t any connection between the 2 issues in any respect. Frustrating. But in accordance to Dr. Teitelbaum, match women have a tendency to have extra issues with low blood strain. “Salt restriction in these cases is a disaster,” he says. Unless you’ve a coronary heart situation (through which case you need to speak to your physician about your salt consumption), there’s doubtless no want to deliberately reduce, and including a touch of iodized salt to your lunchtime salad also can assist you get sufficient sodium and maintain your ranges of iodine in a wholesome zone.
It is understandable for doctors, nutritionists, and fitness experts to advise us on our consumption levels of salt… along with anything else we put in our bodies… based on the latest and greatest information made available through ongoing study and research. What is not understandable is how it came to be that government bureaucrats we’re allowed to inject themselves into the discussion between us and our caregivers and wage war on cherry-picked commodities.
As it has been with so many other examples – fat, sugar, and caffeine to name a few – we are finding out just how wrong government officials have been about what is good for us and what is not. At the end of the day, though, our personal health is our own war to wage… not theirs.iGenSystem]